‘Your speech-writer should be fired’: Owaisi to Rajnath over Gandhi-Savarkar remark


An afternoon after Defence Minister Rajnath Singh mentioned it used to be on Mahatma Gandhi’s recommendation that Hindutva icon Vinayak Damodar Savarkar filed a mercy petition with the British, AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi, amongst different Opposition leaders, attacked the BJP chief, alleging that he used to be “trying to twist history”.

Sharing on Twitter a letter through Gandhi on Jan 25,1920 to Savarkar’s brother relating to a case, Owaisi accused Singh of giving a “twist” to what Gandhi wrote.

“Sir Rajnath Singh, you said that Savarkar’s grovelling mercy petitions were on Gandhi’s advice. Here’s the letter to Savarkar from Gandhi. No mention of petition to British begging for leniency, mercy and promising to be a faithful servant of the crown,” he mentioned.

The AIMIM chief additional mentioned that the primary petition Savarkar wrote used to be in 1911, simply six months upon getting into jail and Gandhi used to be then in South Africa. Savarkar wrote once more in 1913/14 and Gandhi’s recommendation is from 1920, he added. “Is it a lie that this ‘Veer’ rejected the tricolour and wanted Bhagva as our flag?” he wondered.

Further, mentioning Rajnath’s speech through which the minister had discussed that Savarkar outlined Hindu as any individual for whom India used to be homeland or motherland, Owaisi mentioned that “Savarkar, as a man of limited intellectual prowess, had actually defined Hindu as someone for whom India was fatherland and holy land.”

“IMHO, whoever wrote this speech for you should be fired. It’s not good to have advisers who have a Savarkarite relationship to truth,” he tweeted.

During the release of a guide on Savarkar at Ambedkar International Centre, additionally attended through RSS leader Mohan Bhagwat on Tuesday, Rajnath Singh had alleged that there used to be a planned conspiracy to defame Savarkar, and that it used to be on Gandhi’s recommendation that he wrote his mercy petitions.

“A lot of falsehood was spread against Savarkar. It was repeatedly said that he filed multiple mercy petitions before the British government. The truth is he did not file these petitions for his release. Generally a prisoner has right to file a mercy petition. Mahatma Gandhi had asked that you file a mercy petition. It was on Gandhi’s suggestion that he filed a mercy petition. And Mahatma Gandhi had appealed that Savarkar ji should be released. He had said the way we are running movement for freedom peacefully, so would Savarkar,” Singh mentioned.

He added that Savarkar had in truth impressed folks to wreck the shackles of slavery and agitated in opposition to untouchability, amongst quite a lot of different social problems, together with girls’s rights. However, his contribution in cultural team spirit of the rustic used to be not noted, Singh mentioned.

Meanwhile, the replica of Gandhi’s letter to S D Savarkar, shared through Owaisi, mentioned, “I have your letter. It is difficult to advise you. I suggest, however, your framing a brief petition setting forth the facts of the case bringing out in clear relief the fact that the offence committed by your brother was purely political. I suggest this in order that it would be possible to concentrate public attention on the case. Meanwhile as I have said to you in an earlier letter I am moving in the matter in my own way.”

Congress chief Jairam Ramesh, Shiv Sena MP Sanjay Raut and Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel additionally hit out at Rajnath over his remarks.

Sharing the similar letter on Twitter, Ramesh mentioned, “Rajnath Singhji is amongst the few sober and dignified voices in Modi Sarkar. But he doesn’t seem to be free of the RSS habit of rewriting history. He has given a twist to what Gandhi actually wrote on Jan 25 1920. Here is that letter to Savarkar’s brother.” Further, pointing out that Singh has “clearly blown Gandhi’s letter of Jan 25 1920 out of context,” the Congress chief added, “Not surprising. This is par for the course for the BJP-RSS.”

Raut mentioned Veer Savarkar had by no means apologised to the British. Talking to journalists in Pune, Raut mentioned freedom opponents who languish in prison for greater than ten years can undertake a technique pondering they are able to do one thing after popping out of prison as an alternative of final inside of. In politics or whilst serving imprisonment, a distinct technique is followed, Raut mentioned.

“If Savarkar had adopted any such strategy it cannot be called an apology. Savarkar might have done that (adopted a strategy). This cannot be called an apology. Savarkar never apologised to the British,” he mentioned.

Chattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghel argued how Gandhi may have communicated with a jailed Savarkar.

“Where was Mahatma Gandhi and where was Savarkar at that time? Savarkar was in jail. How could they’ve communicated?” Baghel used to be quoted as announcing through ANI.

“He (Savarkar) filed mercy petitions from jail and continued being with the Britishers,” the Congress chief added. Baghel additionally claimed that Savarkar used to be the primary one to talk of the two-nation principle after he got here out of prison in 1925.

Meanwhile, Savarkar’s grandson, Ranjit Savarkar, claimed the liberty fighter had sought a common amnesty for all political prisoners, reported PTI.  He additionally mentioned that had the liberty fighter apologised to the British, he would were given some submit.

On Gandhi, he informed journalists in Mumbai, “Thousands of people have contributed towards the creation of this nation which has a history of more than 5,000 years. I don’t think Mahatma Gandhi is the Father of the Nation,” including nobody is not easy that Savarkar be referred to as the Father of the Nation, as a result of “this very concept was not acceptable to him”.





Source link

Leave a Comment