Youth vote and union pushback: Why Haryana back-pedalled on university loan decision


The BJP-led Haryana authorities overdue remaining month introduced a scheme with the purpose of “encouraging (state-run) universities to generate resources at their own level and bring financial discipline in the universities to ensure competitiveness and quality education”. But, faced with protests from students and faculty members, and criticism from the Congress and its best friend Jannayak Janata Party (JJP), the federal government made an about-turn previous this week. According to insiders, the ruling birthday celebration didn’t need the subject to snowball into a large agitation and alienate the early life, who’re a the most important electoral workforce.

On April 29, the federal government introduced a Rs 147.75-crore mortgage for 10 state universities as an alternative of the standard grants-in-aid (non-recoverable monetary help) allotted to the establishments. In its announcement, the federal government mentioned this was once the primary instalment underneath the scheme for the 2022-’23 monetary 12 months. The loans have been intended for capital expenditure or spending on development actions, and now not for income expenditure head that comes with salaries and wages of staffers.

Government officers mentioned they didn’t be expecting the colleges to go back the loans and simplest sought after its considered utilisation for development actions. “It is like you give money to your son and tell him to spend it carefully. It is not that you take back the money from your son,” a senior officer within the state management advised The Indian Express.

But, unions of academics and non-teaching staffers got here out in opposition from day one itself, claiming that the transfer may well be adopted via a big hike in scholars’ charges or power the colleges to undertake self-finance schemes as a part of which a bit of scholars must pay the next rate. The authorities’s determination was once a precursor to the privatisation of the colleges, the unions feared. Among the ten universities that have been set to obtain the mortgage are Kurukshetra University, Maharishi Dayanand University (Rohtak), Chaudhary Devi Lal University (Sirsa), Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar National Law University (Sonepat), and Chaudhary Bansi Lal University (Bhiwani).

The Opposition waded in, with Congress chief Randeep Singh Surjwala tweeting on May 6, “The Khattar government has decided to drown the education sector with the burden of loans. The state-run universities were supposed to receive Rs 300 crore from the state Budget but now have received the first loan instalment … From education to employment, the BJP-JJP government has been betraying the youth at every step.”

The protests intensified previous this week. From May 9 onwards, academics of 13 government-run universities began dressed in black badges and two days later, academics and non-teaching school noticed a three-hour strike. The Indian National Students’ Organisation (INSO), which is the scholars’ wing of the JJP, additionally got here out in opposition to the federal government’s transfer, forcing it to back off.

Announcing the coverage reversal on Thursday, Additional Chief Secretary (Higher Education) Anand Mohan Sharan clarified that Rs 147.75 crore for the colleges was once “grant-in-aid only” and now not a mortgage. The bureaucrat mentioned the target of the sooner transfer was once “to highlight the financial autonomy, independence and self-reliance of the universities” and “further increase productivity and quality through internal resource generation through activities that will further enhance their skills and further increase the employability of their students”.

A senior officer mentioned, “We had to declare the loan of Rs 147.75 crore as grant-in-aid because the critics were not understanding the concept behind this scheme.”

Welcoming the federal government’s about-turn, JJP secretary-general Digvijay Chautala, the brother of Deputy Chief Minister Dushyant Chautala and INSO nationwide president, mentioned, “When this decision (loans to universities instead of grants-in-aid) was taken, the INSO was the first to raise this issue. Now that the government has withdrawn this decision, it should be welcomed. Universities are important to make our generations efficient and the government grant for these institutions is very much needed.”

The pupil organisation’s state president Pradeep Deswal mentioned the federal government’s reversal was once a “victory of every student”.

Former state Finance Minister Sampat Singh mentioned with “youths emerging as an influential section in the society because of their large number, which also matters in electoral politics” the federal government didn’t need to drag out the problem.

“However, I still have apprehensions that the issue has not ended but has just been diverted for the time being,” Singh mentioned. “This will come again as the officers have said that the loans were offered for capital expenditure in the universities, hinting that the grants-in-aid may continue only for revenue expenditure, which is meant for salaries and wages of the teaching and non-teaching staff. But if the government makes such a decision again, it will certainly backfire.”

Singh, a six-time MLA, added, “The students have nothing to do with capital or revenue expenditure. They just know that their fees should not be increased. And if universities opt for a self-financing scheme, it will happen at the cost of their pocket. For example, if the university decides to give admission to 25 seats out of a total of 100 seats under the self-financing scheme, then the burden will be on the students themselves. Universities are not earning bodies. Education, health, and social welfare are not meant for profit-making. To earn revenues, you have departments like excise and taxation, revenue and tourism. The issue here is not only the salary of teaching and non-teaching staffers. The issue is how to ensure research in universities and higher quality education to the students who come from the families of farmers, labourers, and other weaker sections of the society.”





Source link

Leave a Comment